Survivors and various stakeholder groups expressed criticism of the Constitutional Court’s decision to suspend speed‑limiters on cargo and passenger transport. Victims, the organization PDH, and a member of parliament all agreed that removing the devices could jeopardize passenger safety. They argued that the lack of speed control increases the risk of accidents on roads. Transport operators countered that the speed‑limiter system is not practical for everyday use. They claim the technology imposes operational difficulties and cost burdens. The dispute highlights a tension between safety concerns and logistical feasibility in the freight and passenger sectors.