Jim O'Callaghan appeared before a committee for questioning during an escalating dispute over the solicitor's role. Committee members used the session to seek his explanation of the controversy. The precise allegations and supporting evidence were not identified, and O'Callaghan's answers were not detailed. No ruling, finding or sanction was announced after his appearance. The disagreement was already deepening when the committee took up the issue. No further procedural step had been specified, leaving the committee's eventual recommendation and O'Callaghan's full response uncertain.