Assigning members of the Sovereignty Council to supervise executive bodies is a constitutional error, the article argues, because oversight can quickly turn into overreach in implementation. It points to the May 2025 decision by the head of the Sovereignty Council to cancel members’ supervision of government units as an official admission that the arrangement failed. The article asks why the same approach is being insisted on again now. It also says the constitutional document gives the council the right to sign, not the right to govern.