Daphne's 'gossip' about Pullicino Orlando was not public interest, tribunal rules
newsare.net
What Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando did in his private life was not in the public interest provided that it did not affect his public role, a tribunal ruled on Tuesday in case concerning photos published by Daphne Caruana Galizia. The Information and Data ProtectiDaphne's 'gossip' about Pullicino Orlando was not public interest, tribunal rules
What Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando did in his private life was not in the public interest provided that it did not affect his public role, a tribunal ruled on Tuesday in case concerning photos published by Daphne Caruana Galizia. The Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal ruled that news reports purely intended to satisfy the curiosity of people who thirsted for details of a person’s private life did not qualify as matters of public interest and could not be afforded protection under a claim of freedom of expression. Dr Pullicino Orlando, a former MP who currently chairs the Malta Council of Science and Technology, had filed the case against Daphne Caruana Galizia, claiming that five images about his private life which the late journalist had published on her blog Running Commentary breached data protection laws. The images were included in six blog posts Ms Caruana Galizia uploaded between 2010 and 2016 when Dr Pullicino Orlando had been dining out at a St Paul’s Bay restaurant, signing a deed at a notarial office, accompanying his girlfriend on a Valentine’s trip to Sicily, traveling with the same girlfriend to London and Sicily and also attending a local song... Read more














