Pritam Singh appeal adjourned: Questions over WP chief 'doing nothing' for 8 weeks, what 'I won't judge you' meant
newsare.net
The High Court hearing of Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh's appeal against his conviction on Tuesday (Nov 4) saw exchanges between Justice Steven Chong, defence lawyer Andre Jumabhoy and Deputy Attorney-General (DAG) Goh Yihan over the Leader of the OpPritam Singh appeal adjourned: Questions over WP chief 'doing nothing' for 8 weeks, what 'I won't judge you' meant
The High Court hearing of Workers' Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh's appeal against his conviction on Tuesday (Nov 4) saw exchanges between Justice Steven Chong, defence lawyer Andre Jumabhoy and Deputy Attorney-General (DAG) Goh Yihan over the Leader of the Opposition's lack of action during a «critical» eight-week period, among others.The court's decision was eventually adjourned to a later date.Here are some highlights from the day's proceedings:Questions over Singh's inaction for 8 weeksDuring the morning session, Justice Chong had asked Jumabhoy to address the court on Singh «doing nothing» between Aug 8, 2021 and Oct 3, 2021, following a meeting with then-party member Raeesah Khan at his house.Justice Chong said if Singh had told Khan that her lies had to be clarified at some point, then it is «unusual» that nothing was done during the «critical» eight-week period. He questioned if this behaviour is consistent with someone who wants to clarify the truth, or someone who was prepared to let the lie be buried.














